The hurdles notwithstanding, the ceasefire represents the first major respite for the besieged people of Gaza.
Jan 18, 2025 08:35 IST First published on: Jan 18, 2025 at 07:15 IST
A ceasefire is not peace. However, in a conflict that began with an act of terror and was followed by an outsized response that has left a region devastated — over 46,000 dead, many of them children — and which threatens to engulf much of West Asia, it is a reason for cautious hope. Israel and Hamas have agreed to pause hostilities and accepted a ceasefire deal after months of negotiation. The first of three phases under the agreement is set to begin on January 19. Hamas has agreed to release 33 Israeli hostages, including men, women and children over 50 and Israel will release Palestinian prisoners. A little over a fortnight into phase 1, talks on implementing phase 2 will begin — the remaining hostages are to be returned, a permanent ceasefire negotiated and all Israeli troops withdrawn from Gaza. Finally, in the third phase, the hope is that the reconstruction of Gaza will begin under the aegis of UN agencies, Egypt and Qatar.
The deal that has gone through was reportedly on the table for some months. The question that arises, then, is: Why was it accepted now? The outgoing US administration will indeed get some credit for the ceasefire. However, President-elect Donald Trump, too, has warned of dire consequences if the violence in Gaza did not abate and Hamas did not return hostages. While much of his rhetoric was directed at the latter, he also sent signals to the Benjamin Netanyahu government by, for example, reposting a particularly critical video about the Israeli PM featuring economist Jeffry Sachs on his social media platform, Truth Social. Netanyahu is reportedly unlikely to visit Washington for Trump’s inauguration. Even before the war, Netanyahu’s diminished political capital was framed by protests on changes in the law regarding judicial reforms. The coalition he leads has bled allies; Netanyahu has held on to power by increasingly relying on the far-right parties. The unpredictability of Washington’s attitude ahead of Trump’s inauguration next week may have pushed Israel into a ceasefire. The three-phase plan, though, will require genuine effort by both sides. Netanyahu’s political ambition and Hamas’s intransigence both threaten to play spoiler. Reports of both sides using the ceasefire as an opportunity to regroup are also disquieting.
The hurdles notwithstanding, the ceasefire represents the first major respite for the besieged people of Gaza. It is in Israel’s best interests — as well as of the other major actors in the region and beyond — to ensure that it is the first step to a more lasting peace. Before the Hamas strike on October 7, 2023, there were significant strides in ties between Israel and moderate Arab states, including the Abraham Accords with Bahrain and the UAE. Reviving the Accords in letter and spirit will require an accommodation of Palestinian aspirations, which is only possible if all sides act in good faith. Delhi too has stakes in the region and enjoys goodwill among the various players. Along with its friends in the Gulf and the US, it should push for the promise of the ceasefire to be realised. The current moment, belated but enormously welcome, must not be squandered.
Discover the Benefits of Our Subscription!
Stay informed with access to our award-winning journalism.
Avoid misinformation with trusted, accurate reporting.
Make smarter decisions with insights that matter.
Choose your subscription package